|
Northwestern
coach Beth Combs recognizes that progress for her program will be measured
in small steps. Although their record does not show it, the Wildcats did
make a number of those steps in 2005.
Senior Ifeoma
Okonkwo realized some of the potential that she had shown earlier in her
career. She led the team in scoring, rebounding and steals. She also
provided an athletic presence that the team was otherwise lacking. While
Okonkwo’s contributions led the team, the program benefited from the
improvement of the sophomore class.
The class does
have talent, but it took a blow early when Kelly Rae Finley left the team
shortly after the season ended. Finley had missed most of her freshman year
with an injury but showed that she had solid Big 10 ability before she was
hurt.
The keys to the
future of the program will be starting guards Sara Stutz and Nadia Bibbs.
Stutz showed herself to be a good all-around player. Her scoring was down
somewhat, but her overall game improved. Bibbs stepped in to the point
guard spot after transferring from Boston University. Bibbs was an adequate
point, but was not as effective as Combs had hoped. She averaged 6.2 points
a game but shot only 31.1% from the field. She finished with 107 assists on
the season, but finished with 108 turnovers.
Junior AJ
Glasauer stepped up and became a consistent contributor in 2005. In her
first two seasons, she was primarily a three point shooter, but she became a
key player last year. She is a good passer and has turned herself into a
better than average defender.
Basketball is a
game of numbers. In watching them, it seemed clear that the Wildcats were a
better team than in Combs’ first season. But their statistics did not
necessarily reflect that. They were not a good shooting team, hitting only
38% of their shots. They were outrebounded by 8 a game, compared to 6 in
the prior season. The Northwestern defense was about the same as it was in
2005.
One area of
improvement was clear. This was the best conditioned Northwestern team in a
number of years. The players physically looked more like Big 10 players
than they had under Olkowski.
The 2006
Northwestern team was marked by inconsistency. At times they were a decent
team. At other times, they looked very bad. This resulted from the fact
that they were a young team with no margin for error. When one of their key
players had a bad game, there was no one to take up the slack.
They also had a
major weakness in the post. The only true post player who started was 6’
Melissa Miller. She only averaged 5.9 points and 5.5 rebounds a game. As a
group the posts only contributed 11.2 points and 8.3 rebounds a game.
When it played
its best, this was a very improved Northwestern team. When it played its
worst, it was a bad as any Wildcat team of recent years. Overall, they were
probably as good as their talent, especially their lack of post talent,
dictated.
Return
to the Northwestern main page
Return to the Big 10 main page
|